Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSantoso, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorBezner-Kerr, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorKassim, Neema
dc.contributor.authorMtinda, Elias
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Haikael
dc.contributor.authorHoddinott, John
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Sera
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T08:31:25Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T08:31:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa053_108
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/2092
dc.descriptionThis research article was published in the Current Developments in Nutrition Volume 4, SUPPLEMENT 2, June 2020en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions are theorized to improve child’s diet through asset provision and program participation. Although some programs measure participation, predictors of participation are understudied. We therefore investigated predictors of men’s and women’s program participation in Singida Nutrition and Agroecology Project (SNAP-Tz; NCT02761876). Methods In SNAP-Tz, ‘mentor farmers’ led their peers (smallholder farmers with children < 1 year at baseline) in learning about agroecology, nutrition, and gender equity through meetings and household visits. At baseline, we collected data on demographics, Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (0–27), men’s involvement in 7 household tasks (0–7), and Abbreviated Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (AWEAI). Participating men (n = 262) and women (n = 283) were asked to recall their program participation biannually. Predictors of high participation, defined as attendance in ≥60% participant meetings and household visits, were identified using multiple logistic regressions, controlling for clustering at the village level. Results Only 59% and 37% of women and men, respectively, had high participation. Women’s high participation was associated with their spouse’s participation (OR = 4.23, P < 0.01), greater food insecurity (OR = 1.03, P = 0.03), years of education (OR = 1.13, P = 0.02), and being empowered (OR = 5.88, P < 0.01). Men’s high participation was associated with their spouse’s participation (OR = 4.22, P < 0.01), greater food insecurity (OR = 2.23, P = 0.01), involvement in household tasks (OR = 1.25, P = 0.04), and age (OR = 1.03, P < 0.01). Conclusions Associations between an individual’s and their spouse’s participation indicate the importance of spousal dynamics. The association between participation and baseline gender equity (i.e., women’s empowerment, men’s involvement in household tasks) highlights the challenges of gender programming in nutrition-sensitive interventions. Analysis of program participation was simple and revealed valuable lessons for program implementation and design; more programs should therefore analyze participation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::NATURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.titlePredictors of Program Participation in a Nutrition-Sensitive Agroecological Intervention in Singida, Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record